The Thought That Counts - Podcasts on Emotional Intelligence from Ei4Change

The Thought That Counts - Insights into Biases and Fallacies 7

Robin Hills Season 2 Episode 7

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 10:07

Short inspirational insights into our common biases and fallacies.  Become more mindful and make better decisions through a deeper understanding of our mental shortcuts and errors in judgment. 


Robin Hills (Ei4Change) was inspired to create The Thought That Counts podcast from his series of bite-sized, inspirational soundbites for his local radio station.

Since then, these contributions have reached a wider audience through the podcast - The Thought That Counts.

This podcast explores the some of our common biases and fallacies:

  • The Misinformation Effect
  • Conformity bias
  • Extinction Burst
  • Social Loafing
  • The Illusion of Transparency

Connect with Ei4Change on LinkedIn
Connect with Ei4Change on Facebook
Connect with Ei4Change on Twitter
Connect with Ei4Change on Instagram
Visit the Ei4Change website Ei4Change.com 

Welcome to The Thought That Counts podcast, inspired by my local radio station Bolton FM. Five short snappy sound bites around aspects of emotional intelligence. In this series, we're exploring common biases and fallacies that can significantly shape the way we interpret information and make decisions.

In this episode, we explore:

The Misinformation Effect, Conformity Bias, Extinction Burst, Social Loafing, and The Illusion of Transparency. I hope you enjoy this episode of The Thought That Counts. The Thought That Counts. The Misinformation Effect describes a common misunderstanding about how memory works. We often assume that memories function like recordings that we can rewind and replay. Fixed and faithful to the original moment. That belief gives memories a sense of solidarity and certainty that feels intuitively right, especially when an event was emotional or important. In reality, memory is a reconstructive process. Each time you recall something, your brain builds the memory from fragments. Sensory traces, emotions, beliefs, and whatever information is available in the present. That means new details, suggestions, or interpretations can quietly weave themselves into the reconstruction. Over time, the memory can shift, sometimes subtly, sometimes dramatically, without you noticing the change. This permeability is what makes the misinformation effect so powerful. Present-day cues, leading questions, or even casual comments can reshape what someone believes they originally experienced. The memory feels just as vivid and true, but its content has been altered by influences that arrived long after the event itself. So yes, your memory is reliable, but not the way you think it is. The Thought That Counts. Conformity bias is often misunderstood as something that only affects people who are weak-willed or easily led. The common belief is that we hold our ground unless someone forces us to comply, and that our choices are driven purely by personal conviction. It's a reassuring idea, one that lets us feel independent, rational, and immune to group influence. In practise, it takes far less than overt pressure to shape our behaviour. A clear instruction from an authority figure, a room full of people acting in a particular way, or even the subtle desire to avoid standing out can be enough to shift what we say or do. These responses are rooted in deep survival instincts. Belonging to the group once meant safety, and challenging authority once carried real risk. These instincts still operate, even in modern settings. This is why conformity bias is so pervasive. We adjust our behaviour, not because we're forced to, but because our brains are wired to prioritise social harmony, approval, and safety. The influence is quiet, powerful, and often invisible, which is precisely what makes it so effective. In short, we're rebels— right up until someone else does something different. The Thought That Counts. An Extinction Burst is often misunderstood as a sign that a bad habit is getting worse, just as we try to stop it. The common belief is that if we simply stop engaging in the behaviour, it'll fade away in a steady linear decline. That expectation makes sense on the surface. Less reinforcement should mean less habit. In reality, the brain doesn't give up so easily. When a familiar reward or routine is suddenly removed, the brain makes a last-ditch attempt to pull us back into the old pattern. The habit temporarily intensifies. Cravings spike, urges feel sharper, and the behaviour may resurface more strongly than before. This isn't failure; it's the nervous system testing whether the old pathway has truly gone. That spike is the extinction burst—a short, uncomfortable surge before the habit weakens for good. Understanding it helps people stay steady. Instead of interpreting the burst as a setback, you can see it as a sign that the habit is losing its grip, and your brain is making one final attempt to restore what used to feel safe and familiar. If your habit fights back, take it as a compliment. You're winning. The Thought That Counts. The Social Loafing Bias challenges the comfortable belief that adding more people to a task naturally boosts effort and results. We often assume that being part of a group will motivate everyone to work harder, share the load, and achieve more together. It feels intuitive. More hands should mean more energy, more focus, and more output. In reality, the opposite pattern frequently emerges. Once our contribution becomes part of a pooled effect, we tend to ease off, even without realising it. Responsibility feels diluted. Individual effort becomes less visible. And the instinct to conserve energy quietly takes over. The group setting creates a psychological buffer. If the outcome doesn't rest solely on us, we don't push quite as hard. This is the essence of social loafing. It isn't laziness or lack of care. It's a natural human response to shared tasks. When accountability is spread across many people, Our brains instinctively reduce effort, assuming others will fill the gaps. Understanding this bias helps teams design work in ways that keep ownership clear and motivation strong. So yes, teamwork is dreamwork-unless the dream is doing less. The Thought That Counts. The illusion of transparency stems from the belief that our inner world is far more visible than it actually is. When emotions run high, it's easy to assume that others can see straight through us, that our anxiety, frustration, or embarrassment is written all over our face. This misconception makes our internal experience feel exposed, as though everyone around us can read our thoughts and feelings with ease. In truth, subjective experience is private and largely unobservable. We consistently overestimate how much of our inner state leaks out into the outer world. While we may feel as though our emotions are blazing like a beacon, others usually notice far less than we imagine. Their attention is divided, their interpretations are imperfect, and they're often preoccupied with their own internal worlds. This gap between what we feel and what others perceive is the essence of the illusion of transparency. Recognising it can be grounding. It reminds us that our thoughts and emotions are not as obvious as they seem. And that we often project our own intensity onto situations where others are simply not tuned in at the same level.

Good news:

people aren't reading your mind. They're too worried about whether you're reading theirs. I'm Robin Hills from EI for Change, Empowering your Emotional Management. The Thought That Counts.